References#
The works cited in this documentation, with links to find them online. Works without a DOI link to a search for them.
Breiger, R. L. and Pattison, P. E. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks, 8(3), 215–256. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(86)90006-7
Davis, A., Gardner, B. B. and Gardner, M. R. (1941). Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class. University of Chicago Press; reissued 2022. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226817996.001.0001
Davis, J. A. and Leinhardt, S. (1972). The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch and B. Anderson (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin. Search
Duxbury, S. W. (2023). The problem of scaling in exponential random graph models. Sociological Methods & Research, 52(2), 764–802 (online 2021). doi:10.1177/0049124120986178
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. doi:10.1201/b16018
Geyer, C. J. (1992). Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science, 7(4). doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137
Goeyvaerts, N., Santermans, E., Potter, G., Torneri, A., Van Kerckhove, K., Willem, L., Aerts, M., Beutels, P. and Hens, N. (2018). Household members do not contact each other at random: implications for infectious disease modelling. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285(1893), 20182201. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.2201
Handcock, M. S. and Gile, K. J. (2010). Modeling social networks from sampled data. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 5–25. doi:10.1214/08-AOAS221
Hinton, G. E. (2002). Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural Computation, 14(8), 1771–1800. doi:10.1162/089976602760128018
Hummel, R. M., Hunter, D. R. and Handcock, M. S. (2012). Improving simulation-based algorithms for fitting ERGMs. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 21(4), 920–939. doi:10.1080/10618600.2012.679224
Krivitsky, P. N. (2017). Using contrastive divergence to seed Monte Carlo MLE for exponential-family random graph models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 107, 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.015
Krivitsky, P. N., Coletti, P. and Hens, N. (2023). A tale of two datasets: Representativeness and generalisability of inference for samples of networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 118(544), 2213–2224. doi:10.1080/01621459.2023.2242627
Krivitsky, P. N. and Handcock, M. S. (2014). A separable model for dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 76(1), 29–46. doi:10.1111/rssb.12014
Krivitsky, P. N., Handcock, M. S. and Morris, M. (2011). Adjusting for network size and composition effects in exponential-family random graph models. Statistical Methodology, 8(4), 319–339. doi:10.1016/j.stamet.2011.01.005
Lazega, E. and Snijders, T. A. B. (eds.) (2016). Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences: Theory, Methods and Applications. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24520-1
Louis, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 44(2), 226–233. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01203.x
Padgett, J. F. (1994). Marriage and elite structure in Renaissance Florence, 1282–1500. Paper delivered to the Social Science History Association. Search; the published analysis of the Florentine families is Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. (1993), Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434, American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319, doi:10.1086/230190.
Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA, 278(10), 823–832. doi:10.1001/jama.278.10.823
Sampson, S. F. (1968). A Novitiate in a Period of Change: An Experimental and Case Study of Social Relationships. PhD dissertation, Cornell University. Search
Wang, P., Robins, G., Pattison, P. and Lazega, E. (2013). Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Social Networks, 35(1), 96–115. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.01.004